Comment your code generously. As a rule of thumb, you should not have a comment for every line of code. Rather you should have a comment per function, where the function is non-trivial.
Examples:
Do not comment every line, especially when it is obvious what is happening.
// declare a new variable called x, and assign its initial value
var x = 0;
// increment x by one
++x;
Do not comment trivial functions, such as getters and setters with no special logic.
var x = 0;
// gets value of x
function getX() {
return x;
}
Do comment complex functions. As a rule of thumb, if it is not immediately obvious what the function does based on its name, or if it has special implementation details that cannot be expected unless inspecting the function body, or any other complicating factor, that function needs a comment
When a function is commented, adhere to a standard format throughout the code base. The standard should be decided based on the choice of documentation pre-processor chosen. If no documentation pre-processor has been chosen, default to adhering to the format expected by JSDoc
/**
* Model class representing a Person
* @constructor
* @param {string} first - first name
* @param {string} last - last name
**/
function Person(first, last) { /* implementation goes here */ }
Do comment complex code snippets
//allows us to use a 1D array to store a 2D grid of data
return grid[y * width + x];
Do use multi-line comments instead of single line comments, for comments that are three lines or more.
/*
* This comment is quite long,
* and it spans multiple lines,
* so we use a different type of syntax
*/
// This is a short comment, just one line
Note that subtle difference such as the number of *
s
is significant.
JSDoc interprets multi-line comments that begin with exactly two *
s
as a comment that should be parsed and added to the documentation,
and ignores any other multi-line comments.
Alternatively, consider breaking this complex logic out into its own function, if this aids making the overall code become easier to read and comprehend.
Avoid checking in commented out lines of code.
Committing or checking in commented out lines of code
into version control systems is OK.
However, if doing so, add a comment with TODO
or NOTE
to indicate what this is being left like this.
//TODO disabling zeroing out of array due to ___
// revisit once resolved
//for (var x = 0; x < t; ++x) {
// arr[x] = 0;
//}
Commenting out by means of an impossible conditional branch is also likewise OK to commit or check in. However, they should also be commented out likewise.
//TODO disabling zeroing out of array due to ___
// revisit once resolved
if (false) {
for (var x = 0; x < t; ++x) {
arr[x] = 0;
}
}
Note that these are both undesirable, and should be avoided where possible. However, if it happens that leaving in the disabled or commented out code improves the ability of the next developer to comprehend what is going on or the original intent of the code, then these are permissible.
Self Documenting Code
Comments are not the only means of documenting your code. A superior means of doing so would be through
- how you name your variables
- how you name your functions
- how you name your function parameters
- breaking up large or complex functions by decomposing them into smaller, single-purpose functions
The idea is to strive for your code to be self documenting. See the section on naming for more details.
Comments should be used to fill in the gaps when any of the above are not appropriate, and in addition to them.